← Back to portfolio

Learning design / Workflow concept

Storyline
Automation

Less repetition.
More room for learning design.

A proposed approach to streamlining repeatable production tasks in Articulate Storyline, while keeping instructional choices and quality review in human hands.

Explore the approach ↓
PRODUCTION WORKFLOW
01 / PLANStructured storyboardContent · objectives · feedback
02 / STANDARDISEReusable slide patternsLayouts · states · interactions
03 / REVIEWHuman quality checkLearning · accessibility · publishing
Concept diagram · proposed process
Focus
E-learning production
Authoring environment
Articulate Storyline
Design principle
Repeatable, reviewable steps
Status
Workflow concept

01 / The challenge

Repetition takes time away from design.

Building a course can involve recreating similar layouts, updating repeated content, and checking the same interaction patterns across many slides. Each manual change creates another opportunity for inconsistency.

This concept asks: which production steps could become repeatable, and where does a designer still need to make the decision?

Project context: the supplied portfolio does not include a project brief, implementation files, or measured outcomes for Storyline Automation. This page presents a proposed approach for discussion.

02 / The approach

Structure first.
Automation second.

A small, reviewable workflow makes it easier to find what can be reused without flattening the learning experience.

  1. 01

    Organise the inputs

    Use a consistent storyboard format for screen text, media references, interaction intent, and feedback. Flag missing content before production.

  2. 02

    Define reusable patterns

    Plan slide layouts and interaction conventions for recurring needs. Keep exceptions explicit so the learning objective guides the format.

  3. 03

    Apply, then inspect

    Identify repeatable updates suitable for automation. Review a small sample before applying a pattern across a course.

Keep the designer in the loop.

Learning objectives, meaningful feedback, branching decisions, and accessibility need deliberate review. A repeatable production step should support those choices.

03 / Quality review

A faster workflow still needs a careful finish.

Proposed acceptance checks before a course is ready to share.

Content and learning intent

Compare slides with the approved storyboard. Check wording, media, feedback, and whether each interaction serves its objective.

Interaction behaviour

Walk through every branch, revisit state, retry path, and completion condition. Check that repeated patterns behave consistently.

Accessibility and usability

Review keyboard navigation, focus order, text alternatives, contrast, and reading order in the published output.

Published course

Test the intended publishing format in its target environment, including progress, resume behaviour, and completion reporting where applicable.

04 / Next steps

From concept to evidence.

Validate the approach with a small representative module. Record the manual baseline, apply one repeatable production step, and compare production time, corrections, and review effort.

No time savings or quality improvements are claimed here. A completed case study would include the actual workflow, sample outputs, and results from that comparison.